concept Updated 2026-07-24 Tags: Business-Ethics, Authoritarianism, Corporations, Governance

Corporate Complicity With Authoritarianism / 企业对威权的共谋

Corporate complicity with authoritarianism / 企业对威权的共谋 is the source’s frame for business participation in an abusive regime while describing that participation as trade, neutrality, legal compliance, or distance through subsidiaries. 133. IBM与纳粹:为什么普通人不应赞美鸡贼主义 develops it through IBM, [[ThomasJWatson|Thomas J. Watson]], [[Dehomag|德霍梅格]], and [[NaziGermany|Nazi Germany]].

The concept matters because the episode separates selling a generic object from building a continuing administrative capability. If a company keeps ownership, training, maintenance, card formats, customized workflows, and political access inside the relationship, then “we only supplied tools” becomes weaker as a moral defense. Public rhetoric about peace or global trade can also become [[AppeasementLogic|appeasement logic]] when it helps a violent state normalize itself.

Key Claims

  • Subsidiaries and local partners can create distance without eliminating control or benefit.
  • Legal compliance is not the same as moral nonparticipation when law itself serves authoritarian violence.
  • Corporate leaders can use idealistic language to protect reputational room while preserving revenue.
  • Wartime or occupation disorder may even protect assets if the company later recovers them without facing full accountability.
  • Complicity is strongest when the firm supplies ongoing operational capacity, not only a one-time commodity.

Connections