concept Updated 2026-07-15 Tags: Internet-Culture, Judgment, Public-Expression, Creators, Ethics

Internet Moral Trial / 互联网审判

Internet moral trial / 互联网审判 is the episode’s critique of turning partial online information into whole-person condemnation. In 【闲聊】想送赵露思一本短歌集–编辑推书,无所不用其极!, the hosts move from [[ZhaoLusi|赵露思]] discourse to a broader warning: criticizing public power or systems is different from treating an individual as fully knowable and punishable from a distance.

The concept is not a ban on judgment. The episode preserves basic values and bottom lines, but argues that online publics often skip evidence, proportionality, and context. It also notes that demands for creators to “talk about” a topic may actually be demands to stand on the correct side of a trial.

Key Claims

  • Incomplete information should reduce confidence, especially when the target is an individual rather than a public system.
  • Public visibility, fame, or wealth does not make a person default eligible for unlimited abuse.
  • Standing against harm does not require every creator to perform a full position on every event.
  • Internet trial often collapses action, motive, and whole personality into one verdict.
  • The source frames “do not throw stones too easily” as a restraint on collective punishment, not as moral indifference.
  • [[RecognitionAsHumiliation|认错等于屈辱]] helps explain why online judgment becomes sticky: if apology means total shame, people resist proportional correction.

Connections