汉明帝 / Emperor Ming of Han

Updated · 14 episodes · 1 show · 14 source notes

entity Topics: Politics

Overview

汉明帝 is now synthesized from a Hanji 717 childhood-political-reading layer, a Hanji 732 death-and-transition layer, a Hanji 733-1 public accession layer, and the Hanji 734-738 early Yongping sequence. The earliest layer shows twelve-year-old Liu Yang explaining why Henan and Nanyang cannot be neutral degree-field comparison points, adding political acuity before the later heir transition. Later sources extend that profile through funeral-order repair, displaced-heir containment, elder support, royal collaboration, talent recommendation, frontier suppression, Yuanling administrative reporting, rites/music codification, public teacher honor, empress and heir designation, construction-burden remonstrance, punitive temperament, local-official exemplars, royal-kin withdrawal, private-client risk, elite punishment, Western Regions volatility, omen humility, empress ritual memory, Northern Xiongnu trade and envoy dignity, Southern Xiongnu containment, official-capacity advice, eclipse self-criticism, official evaluation, classics education, royal-kin treason judgment, title-duty correction, royal affection, Ailao incorporation, Bianqu/Huanghe hydraulic capacity, the Liu Ying case, Confucian ritual, frontier restoration, filial affect, frugal burial, outer-relative restraint, and later ritual precedent.

Current Profile

Hanji 717 supplies the pre-accession childhood layer. In 39 CE, Liu Yang is twelve years old and still Donghai Gong when Guangwu asks about a tiny Chenliu note saying Yingchuan and Hongnong can be consulted but Henan and Nanyang cannot. Liu Yang explains that Henan contains many close ministers and Nanyang contains many imperial hometown relatives, so their land and residence records may exceed norms and cannot serve as reliable degree-field benchmarks. Chenliu officials later confess in line with his explanation, making the episode an early sign of political and administrative acuity before Liu Yang becomes crown prince and then Mingdi.

Hanji 732 now supplies the immediate transition layer. After Guangwu dies in 57 CE, Zhao Xi restores funeral procedure when the heir and princes are unsure how to act, Liu Zhuang succeeds as Mingdi, and Yin Lihua is honored as empress dowager. The same source has Liu Jing send an anonymous letter to Liu Qiang urging him to act on former-heir and Queen Guo grievances. Liu Qiang reports the letter, and Mingdi keeps the matter private while reassuring the displaced branch. This makes Mingdi’s first accession profile succession containment before public rhetoric.

Hanji 733-1 supplies the next accession layer. In 57-58 CE, Mingdi responds to accession by publicly naming his youth and need for elder support, appointing Deng Yu as Taifu and Liu Cang as piaoji general. Liu Cang’s recommendation of Wu Liang turns royal trust into a talent channel, while the Shaodang Qiang fighting shows immediate frontier pressure and early failed responses before Dou Gu and Ma Wu are sent and Ma Wu suppresses the revolt.

The same source gives Mingdi an early ritual and kinship profile. At Yuanling, shangji officials report grain prices and popular hardship before Guangwu’s tablet, making ancestral memory an administrative accountability scene. Liu Qiang’s death receives intense mourning but simple burial goods; Liu Jing’s renewed astrology-driven hopes for disorder lead Mingdi to move him from Shanyang to Guangling; Ji Tong’s mediated use of Xianbei against Wuhuan helps quiet the northeast; and Liu Cang’s rites/music proposal turns the new reign toward formal sacrificial, dress, vehicle, music, and dance standards.

Hanji 734 then supplies the next layer. In Yongping 2 / 59 CE, Mingdi performs Mingtang sacrifice to Guangwu, observes the heavens at Lingtai, declares amnesty, visits Biyong for archery, and stages the first Biyong elder-care ceremony. The central figure is his former Shangshu teacher Huan Rong. Mingdi makes Huan Rong wugeng, gives him ceremonial place and reward, listens to him with text in hand, refuses to answer a classics question while the teacher is present, cares for him in illness, and honors his death. This adds imperial teacher-honor ritual to Mingdi’s profile: public deference to a teacher becomes a way to elevate Confucian learning and model role order for officials.

The same 59 CE layer also shows early royal-kin favor and elite discipline. Mingdi gives unusual favor to Zhongshan king Liu Yan because of Guo and Yin dowager ties, sacrifices to Xiao He and Huo Guang during the Chang’an trip, executes Dou Lin after corruption and deception charges while rebuking Dou Rong, holds the first Five Suburban seasonal rites, and punishes Yin Feng’s killing of Princess Liyi despite Yin-family status. These branches are kept source-scoped because they are less developed than the Huan Rong story, but they show Mingdi’s court already joining ritual display, family favor, and legal discipline.

Hanji 735 follows as the next current layer. In Yongping 3 / 60 CE, Mingdi removes and appoints senior ministers, makes Ma empress, and establishes Liu Da, the child Ma raises, as crown prince. The same source shows the best and worst sides of his court: Zhongli Yi can persuade him to stop North Palace construction by linking an omen to people’s farming burden, yet Mingdi is also described as strict, surveillance-prone, and sometimes personally violent toward officials. Yao Song’s ritual quotation defuses one anger scene, while Zhongli Yi’s later leniency memorial is protected but not adopted.

Hanji 735 also gives a local and frontier background. Liu Ping’s Quanjiao governance creates unusually strong trust signals, and Guo He is publicly rewarded so commoners can see good administration honored. The Western Regions notice places Shache and Khotan in violent churn before the Hanji 736 continuation.

Hanji 736 then follows. In 61-63 CE, Mingdi responds to Liu Cang’s remonstrance by turning back from a planned hunt, then lets Liu Cang return to Dongping after repeated requests to leave the central power field while retaining the piaoji general seal and receiving major gifts. The same source shows Mingdi punishing Liang Song’s court slander, the implicated-guest danger that Zheng Zhong had avoided earlier, and Dou Mu’s false use of Yin Taihou’s authority for marriage coercion. Mingdi’s treasure-cauldron edict adds another restraint layer: auspicious objects may be recognized, but exaggerated saintly praise is to be rejected rather than rewarded.

Hanji 737 supplies the next early Yongping layer. In 64 CE, Mingdi’s court buries Empress Dowager Yin Lihua and gives her the 光烈 posthumous title, tying maternal dynastic memory to empress posthumous-title practice. In 65 CE, Mingdi accepts trade contact with Northern Xiongnu despite ongoing raids, receives Zong Jun’s warning that literary or merely clean officials are not enough for actual governance, and reacts to a solar eclipse by soliciting confidential criticism, publishing it, and treating the criticisms as his own crimes.

The earliest Liu Ying and Duliaoying layers show Mingdi balancing tolerance and containment. His退赎诏 returns Liu Ying’s redemption silk and treats Huang-Lao and Buddhist fasting as harmless devotion, which complicates the later Chu-prison suspicion. After Zheng Zhong detects Xugu Duhou seeking Northern Xiongnu help, Mingdi’s court creates Duliaoying to prevent Southern/Northern Xiongnu collusion.

Hanji 738 then extends the same 65-67 CE frontier signal problem. Northern Xiongnu offers tribute while continuing frontier raids. Mingdi considers sending a return mission, but Zheng warns that the chanyu will use Han contact to strengthen his prestige, unsettle Southern Xiongnu, affect Wuhuan, and make Western Regions states doubt Han resolve. Mingdi rejects the warning, sends Zheng anyway, and imprisons him after repeated memorials. Later Northern Xiongnu testimony confirms that Zheng had once risked death rather than kowtow, so Mingdi recalls and appoints him. This gives Mingdi a correctable but costly judgment pattern before the later Chu-prison corrections.

The same source shows Mingdi trying to make order administrative and educational. He requires annual reporting of the best and worst local officials after sufficient tenure, promotes Confucian education for the crown prince, princes, noble children, and official families, creates palace schooling for outer-relative children, and extends classics study even into guard units. The episode therefore places Mingdi’s court between appointment quality, reward-punishment credibility, and ritual-classics order.

Hanji 738 also supplies two family-duty tests. Guangling King Liu Jing first receives fraternal containment after rebellion-suggestive physiognomy talk, but continued shamanic sacrifice and curse activity lead Fan Tiao to argue that the empire is Gaozu’s dynastic realm rather than Mingdi’s private property. In the Ding Hong branch, Mingdi’s court refuses Ding’s request to yield his inherited title, and later appoints him shizhong after Bao Jun persuades him to accept public responsibility.

Hanji 739 adds royal affection, southwestern incorporation, hydraulic capacity, and the opening Liu Ying case. Mingdi misses Liu Cang after a royal visit and praises his “doing good” ethic. He incorporates Ailao King Liu Mao through county creation and road/crossing works, then sends Wang Jing and Wang Wu to repair Bianqu and separate Yellow River/Bian River flows. But the same source begins Liu Ying’s fall: initial family restraint gives way to suicide, ministerial shame, and wider implication.

Hanji 740 continues the Chu-prison layer. Mingdi’s suspicion after Liu Ying’s suicide helps create a coercive implication cascade of torture, fear, false implication, deaths, exile, and imprisonment. Partial correction arrives through Lu Xu’s character evidence, Jian Lang’s risky verification, Empress Ma’s warning, and Yuan An’s unsupported-case releases. Mingdi is therefore responsive, but often only after high human cost.

Hanji 741 and Hanji 743 supply the agrarian, classics, and frontier restoration profile. Mingdi performs the ploughing rite, visits Confucius’s former residence, has royal youths lecture on classics, and then authorizes a four-route campaign after Geng Bing and Dou Gu push for renewed Western Regions strategy. In 74 CE, his Yuanling dream of Guangwu and Yin Lihua makes filial ritual emotionally concrete, while Dou Gu and Geng Bing’s Cheshi campaign restores Han offices in the Western Regions.

Hanji 744 gives the death and restraint layer. Mingdi dies in 75 CE after eighteen Yongping years, and the episode frames his reign as part of “Ming-Zhang governance”: conservative, administrator-centered, and resistant to uncontrolled palace-family privilege. His death instructions avoid a separate sacrificial temple, simplify Xianjie Ling, and leave Zhangdi able to accept Liu Cang’s later warning against a costly tomb town.

Hanji 899 supplies later ritual memory. When Lingdi visits Guangwu’s Yuanling, Cai Yong interprets Mingdi’s tomb-sacrifice arrangement as preserving filial intention through solemn form rather than dispensable ceremony. Mingdi thus remains a precedent for emotionally meaningful ritual as well as frugal restraint.

Key Characteristics

  • Eastern Han second emperor whose profile joins childhood political acuity, funeral-order transition, confidential royal-kin containment, accession elder support, talent recommendation, Yuanling administrative memory, teacher-honor ritual, succession designation, royal-kin distance management, elite punishment, frontier diplomacy, local exemplars, official evaluation, Confucian education, material state capacity, legal overreach, correction, filial grief, and frugal restraint.
  • Correctable ruler whose judgment can change after evidence, public criticism, or courageous remonstrance, but whose harshness can require subordinates to manage anger and retaliation risk.
  • Frontier ruler who treats Northern Xiongnu pressure as a credibility problem, yet initially misses Zheng Zhong’s warning about diplomatic and ritual signaling.
  • Administrative and educational ruler who uses teacher protocol, annual official review, classics schooling, agrarian ritual, and later conference-style learning to stabilize court order.
  • Royal-family ruler whose affection and kinship restraint coexist with treason-law boundaries in the Liu Jing and Liu Ying cases.
  • State-capacity ruler whose halted North Palace works, Liu Cang settlement, Ailao incorporation, Bianqu works, Northern Xiongnu campaign, and Western Regions restoration show both ambition and capacity for correction.
  • Filial, teacher-honoring, and frugal ritual actor whose Huan Rong ceremonies, Yuanling grief, Shouling order, death instructions, and later ritual memory convert hierarchy and dynastic memory into disciplined form.

Evidence

  • Childhood political reading: Hanji 717 records twelve-year-old Liu Yang explaining that Henan and Nanyang are unreliable degree-field benchmarks because close ministers and imperial hometown relatives shape those commanderies.
  • Confession confirming interpretation: Hanji 717 says Chenliu officials later confess in a way that matches Liu Yang’s reading, leading Liu Xiu to admire him.
  • Funeral and maternal transition: Hanji 732 records Guangwu’s death, Zhao Xi’s funeral-order repair, Mingdi’s succession, and Yin Lihua’s recognition as empress dowager.
  • Anonymous-letter containment: Hanji 732 records Liu Jing’s anonymous provocation to Liu Qiang, Liu Qiang’s sealed report, Mingdi’s private handling, and reassurance of the displaced Guo/Liu Qiang branch.
  • Accession support and talent channel: Hanji 733-1 records Mingdi naming his youth, appointing Deng Yu as Taifu and Liu Cang as piaoji general, and accepting Liu Cang’s recommendation of Wu Liang.
  • First frontier and royal-kin layer: Hanji 733-1 records the Shaodang Qiang revolt, Dou Gu and Ma Wu’s deployment, Ma Wu’s suppression, Liu Qiang’s mourned death, and Liu Jing’s Shanyang-to-Guangling relocation.
  • Yuanling reporting and rites/music codification: Hanji 733-1 records shangji officials reporting grain prices and hardship before Guangwu’s tablet, Ji Tong’s northeastern frontier result, and Liu Cang’s proposal for sacrificial, clothing, vehicle, music, and dance standards.
  • Teacher-honor ritual: Hanji 734 records Mingdi honoring Huan Rong at Biyong, seating him at the Taichang office, listening with text in hand, refusing to answer while the teacher is present, visiting his sickbed, mourning him, and granting burial land.
  • Empress and heir designation: Hanji 735 records Mingdi making Ma empress and making Liu Da crown prince after Liu Da has been raised by Ma.
  • Stopped construction through remonstrance: Hanji 735 records Zhongli Yi’s North Palace remonstrance, Mingdi’s stoppage of the works, expense reduction, and apology to ministers.
  • Harshness and ritual deflection: Hanji 735 describes Mingdi’s strict temper and has Yao Song defuse an anger scene with ritual language.
  • Local governance exemplars: Hanji 735 records Liu Ping’s trust-producing county governance and Mingdi’s visible reward for Guo He.
  • Frontier diplomacy and envoy dignity: Hanji 738 records Zheng Zhong’s warning against a Northern Xiongnu return mission, Mingdi’s imprisonment of Zheng, and later rehabilitation after hostile-side testimony confirms Zheng’s refusal to bow.
  • Official evaluation and classics education: Hanji 738 records annual best/worst official reporting, classics education for royal and official households, outer-relative schooling, guard-unit study, and Xiongnu noble sons studying at Han.
  • Royal-kin and title-duty judgment: Hanji 738 records Liu Jing’s restricted authority, Fan Tiao’s public-law answer, Liu Jing’s suicide, Ding Hong’s title-yielding attempt, Bao Jun’s correction, and Ding’s appointment.
  • Royal affection and kinship restraint: Hanji 739 records Mingdi’s emotional farewell to Liu Cang, praise of “为善最乐”, initial decision not to execute Liu Ying, and protection of Liu Ying’s children and mother.
  • Southwestern frontier and hydraulic capacity: Hanji 739 records Ailao submission, county creation, road/crossing works, and Wang Jing’s large Bianqu/Huanghe project.
  • Chu-prison overreach and correction: Hanji 740 records Mingdi’s case expansion through torture and later correction through Lu Xu, Jian Lang, Empress Ma, and Yuan An.
  • Agrarian, Confucian, and campaign order: Hanji 741 records ploughing ritual, Confucius-site visitation, royal classics lectures, and authorization of the four-route Northern Xiongnu campaign.
  • Western Regions restoration and filial mourning: Hanji 743 records Mingdi’s Yuanling grief, humility over auspicious signs, and approval of restored Western Regions offices after Cheshi.
  • Death, burial, and outer-relative restraint: Hanji 744 gives Mingdi’s death, frugal burial instructions, Guantao-princess decision, Yan Zhang non-promotion, and Zhangdi’s later acceptance of Liu Cang’s remonstrance.
  • Later ritual precedent: Hanji 899 has Cai Yong interpret Mingdi’s Yuanling practice as preserved filial ritual intention.
  • Early ritual and elite discipline: Hanji 734 records Mingtang sacrifice, Biyong archery and elder-care ceremony, special treatment for Zhongshan king Liu Yan, the Chang’an sacrifices to Xiao He and Huo Guang, Dou Lin’s punishment, Five Suburban seasonal rites, and Yin Feng’s punishment after killing Princess Liyi.
  • Early royal-kin withdrawal and anti-flattery: Hanji 736 records Mingdi accepting Liu Cang’s practical return to Dongping while preserving his honor, punishing Liang Song and Dou Mu’s branches, and rejecting excessive auspicious-sign praise after the treasure-cauldron report.
  • Earliest Yongping ritual and religious layer: Hanji 737 records Yin Lihua’s burial and 光烈 title, Mingdi’s return of Liu Ying’s redemption silk, and the dream-mission-White-Horse-Temple Buddhism narrative.
  • Early frontier and institutional containment: Hanji 737 records trade contact with Northern Xiongnu, Zheng Zhong’s original refusal to kowtow, Xugu Duhou’s attempted northern contact, and the creation of Duliaoying.
  • Personnel and feedback correction: Hanji 737 records Zong Jun’s warning against relying on literary or merely clean officials and Mingdi’s eclipse-triggered self-criticism after confidential memorials.

Qualifications

Mingdi should not be flattened into either benevolent filial ruler or punitive autocrat. The current profile holds both together: he builds accession support, talent recommendation, evaluation, education, frontier capacity, hydraulic works, ritual order, local exemplar display, and frugal memory, while also needing feedback mechanisms to correct construction burdens, misread frontier advice, anger, and later treason overreach. Hanji 717 supports a childhood political-acuity signal, but the host’s inference that this directly worsened Liu Qiang’s crown-prince position remains source-scoped. Hanji 732’s cause-of-death material belongs primarily to Liu Xiu and imperial death-cause inference; for Mingdi it supplies transition setting, not a medical claim. Its 刘京 form is normalized to Liu Jing, and Queen Guo remains source-scoped because this page does not yet maintain her biography. Hanji 733-1’s Dian Liang, early Dian Wu, Zhang Hong, Pian He, exact rites/music prescriptions, and Geng Yan death notice remain source-scoped unless later evidence makes them durable. Hanji 734’s Li Gong, exact sanlao and wugeng institutional details, Zhongshan king Liu Yan, Xiao He/Huo Guang sacrifice details, Dou Lin, Yin Feng, Princess Liyi/Liu Shou, Five Suburban seasonal rites, and South Xiongnu succession remain source-scoped. Hanji 735’s Zhao Xi, Guo Dan, Yu Yan, Ma Yuan/Yuntai omission, Liu Jian, Liu Xian, exact star-field details, and Shache-Khotan minor succession actors remain source-scoped. Hanji 736’s Liu Jian death notice, Three Excellencies personnel changes, Liu Xu marriage target, minor Dou-family names, Shache succession names, and exact treasure-cauldron provenance remain source-scoped. Hanji 737’s gendered Yin Lihua reading, Buddhism transmission narrative, and exact Duliaoying details remain source-scoped. Hanji 738’s Zheng Zhong and Ding Hong normalizations remain source-sensitive; Liu Gong, Liu Dang, Four Surnames minor marquises, Ding family details, and minor ritual dates remain source-scoped. Hanji 740’s Buddhist-secret-organization explanation remains source-scoped rather than a settled cause.

What Changed

  • Added Hanji 717 as Mingdi’s pre-accession childhood layer: Liu Yang’s degree-field explanation and Liu Xiu’s admiration after Chenliu confession.
  • Kept Hanji 732 as Mingdi’s immediate transition layer: Guangwu funeral order, Yin Lihua’s empress-dowager recognition, and confidential handling of Liu Jing’s letter to Liu Qiang.
  • Reframed Hanji 733-1 as the next public accession layer rather than the first Mingdi evidence.
  • Expanded Mingdi’s royal-kin profile from childhood succession implication through Liu Qiang mourning, Liu Jing relocation, and quiet containment of displaced-heir grievance.
  • Preserved the later Hanji 734-744 and Hanji 899 layers on teacher honor, correction, harshness, official evaluation, classics schooling, frontier restoration, Chu-prison overreach, frugal burial, and later ritual precedent.

Relationships

  • 度田问责 - childhood policy-reading context in which Liu Yang identifies protected land-survey comparison zones.
  • 赵熙 - taiwei who restores funeral hierarchy at Guangwu’s death.
  • 继位亲族安抚与隔离 - concept grounded by Mingdi’s private handling of Liu Jing’s letter and reassurance of Liu Qiang’s branch.
  • 帝王死因史料推断 - upstream Liu Xiu death-cause frame that creates Mingdi’s transition setting.
  • 《东观汉记》 - source tradition used by Hanji 732 for Guangwu health clues before Mingdi’s accession.
  • 郑众 - frontier official whose loyal diplomatic refusal Mingdi first punishes and later recognizes.
  • 邓禹 - elder founding minister Mingdi appoints Taifu at accession.
  • 吴良 - talent recommended by Liu Cang and appointed by Mingdi.
  • 东海恭王刘强 - royal kinsman whose death Mingdi mourns while keeping burial goods simple.
  • 马武 - commander who suppresses the early Shaodang Qiang revolt under Mingdi.
  • 祭肜 - Liaodong official whose Xianbei-mediated frontier action belongs to Mingdi’s early reign.
  • 宗庙记忆中的行政汇报 - concept grounded by Mingdi’s Yuanling grain-price and hardship reporting scene.
  • 宗室退权自保 - Liu Cang branch where Mingdi preserves honor while allowing practical distance.
  • 梁松 - slander case that exposes private-guest implication risk.
  • 窦穆 - elite-family offender whose false dowager-order marriage coercion Mingdi punishes.
  • 阴丽华 - mother whose death and 光烈 title tie Mingdi’s reign to empress posthumous-title ritual.
  • 宗均 - official whose warning corrects Mingdi’s preference for literary or merely clean officials.
  • 钟离意 - remonstrator whose burden argument stops Mingdi’s North Palace construction.
  • 姚松 - official whose ritual quotation defuses Mingdi’s punitive anger.
  • 桓荣 - former teacher whose public honoring becomes Mingdi’s earliest current teacher-ritual layer.
  • 帝王尊师礼制 - concept grounded by Mingdi’s Biyong, Taichang, sickbed, and funeral conduct toward Huan Rong.
  • 刘平 - local administrator whose trust signals enter Mingdi’s early Yongping profile.
  • 郭贺 - Jingzhou inspector whom Mingdi publicly rewards as a local-governance exemplar.
  • 都辽营 - frontier institution created during Mingdi’s reign to contain Southern/Northern Xiongnu collusion risk.
  • 帝王自责诏 - concept grounded by Mingdi’s eclipse response and publication of criticism.
  • 早期中国佛教宫廷传播 - concept tied to Mingdi’s Liu Ying edict and White Horse Temple transmission narrative.
  • 使节礼节国威 - concept grounded by Mingdi’s misreading and later rehabilitation of Zheng’s refusal to kowtow.
  • 边疆册封信用权衡 - frontier concept sharpened by Mingdi’s Northern Xiongnu return-mission debate.
  • 广陵王刘荆 - royal brother whose case tests Mingdi’s family feeling against treason-law boundaries.
  • 樊鯈 - reviewer who tells Mingdi that the realm is not private family property.
  • 丁鸿 - heir and later minister appointed by Mingdi after Bao Jun’s recommendation.
  • 鲍峻 - recommender whose public-duty correction brings Ding into court service.
  • 东平王刘苍 - royal kinsman whose appointment, Wu Liang recommendation, rites/music proposal, farewell, moral answer, and later burial remonstrance reveal Mingdi/Zhangdi family politics.
  • 哀牢王柳貌 - submitting frontier ruler whose population is incorporated under Mingdi.
  • 王景 - hydraulic official whose Bianqu works display Mingdi-era state capacity.
  • 刘英 - royal accused whose case exposes Mingdi’s treason suspicion and legal overreach.
  • 刑讯攀引扩大 - failure mode created under Mingdi’s Chu-prison case.
  • 明德马皇后 - consort adviser whose counsel helps stop excessive Chu-prison punishment.
  • 北匈奴 - frontier opponent whose raids and diplomacy test Mingdi’s credibility judgments.
  • 耿秉 - adviser whose Western Regions strategy helps justify the offensive turn.
  • 窦固 - commander whose route takes Yiwu and whose later petition Mingdi approves.
  • 节俭帝陵约束 - concept grounded in Mingdi’s Shouling order and death instructions.
  • 汉章帝 - successor who inherits Mingdi’s frugal and frontier precedents.
  • 光武帝 - father whose Yuanling memory anchors Mingdi’s filial ritual layer.

Sources

14 source notes across 1 show
  1. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》899丨好清斗贪官 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  2. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》744丨大汉耿恭求生菜谱,竟让贝爷望尘莫及? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  3. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》743丨戳人心窝的历史瞬间:明帝刘庄的温情梦 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  4. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》741丨为什么古代匈奴总要入侵中原? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  5. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》740丨让你醍醐灌顶的职场智慧!(职场必备) 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  6. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》739丨坐拥天下美女的皇帝,其实也会孤独 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  7. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》738丨他拼死保全大汉气节,为何惨遭蒙冤? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  8. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》737丨皇后谥号制度第一人,刘秀老婆不简单! 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  9. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》736丨生在皇权下,他凭什么能安度晚年 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  10. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》735丨13岁入宫终生未育,她的贤明真罕见! 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  11. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》734丨桓荣成大儒,因为明帝是个好捧哏? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  12. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》733-1丨历史所遗忘的帝王:治世明君刘庄 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  13. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》732丨东汉光武帝刘秀驾崩!病死的? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴
  14. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》717丨13个字引发的帝王之怒! 芮淇讲透资治通鉴