Podcast Atlas
entity Updated 2026-08-07

Federal Reserve

172.全球宏观和资本市场2026半年度复盘与展望：AI叙事的下一步 adds the AI-capex constraint version. 大卫翁 and Ricky argue that a U.S. economy supported by AI investment, equity wealth effects, and possible inflation pressure leaves the Fed unlikely to hike but also unable to cut easily; Ricky expects communication swings to manage expectations, while warning that less clear guidance can raise volatility.

161. 全球宏观和资本市场2026一季度复盘与展望 adds the first-quarter 2026 stagflation-policy version. Ricky argues that oil and inflation pressure can turn market expectations away from rate cuts and toward no-cut or even hike worries, which is especially negative for U.S. technology equities. 大卫翁 puts more weight on political incentives, arguing that a new chair could care about fiscal coordination and midterm-election timing as much as textbook monetary constraints.

155.如何理解黄金的史诗级波动 adds a succession-and-balance-sheet layer through Kevin Warsh. The source says the initial market narrative treated Warsh as hawkish, helping trigger a gold trend break, but 大卫翁 argues that Warsh may be a politically flexible chair whose “trend driven” language can justify lower rates under Donald Trump pressure. The episode also treats repeated failed or interrupted balance-sheet runoff attempts as evidence that the market system depends heavily on central-bank liquidity.

153.全球宏观和资本市场2026展望：大年之后，仍是大年？ adds a 2026 market-expectations layer. Ricky expects U.S. inflation to have room to fall toward roughly 2.5% and sees Donald Trump as incentivized to favor fiscal and monetary easing before the midterms, while 大卫翁 remains more cautious about inflation because preemptive cuts, commodities, and tariffs could interfere.

146.美国经济这么差，美股还能继续涨吗 | 串台《美轮美换》 adds a later Qizhulou/美轮美换 version of the same pressure cluster. The episode says shutdown-disrupted data leaves the Fed “driving in fog,” while Donald Trump pressure on Jerome Powell, the attempted removal of Lisa Cook, and Stephen Miran’s nomination make Central Bank Independence and Federal Funds Rate As Policy Signal harder for markets to read.

不熄灯 E02：币圈闪崩、美国政府关门、First Brands 破产与娃哈哈风波 adds a shutdown-data layer. The source argues that a U.S. government shutdown can delay CPI, employment, and operational data while the Fed is trying to decide how to balance inflation, employment, credit stress, and political pressure, making Government Shutdown Data Blindness part of the same branch as Federal Funds Rate As Policy Signal and Official Statistics Credibility.

The Federal Reserve appears in EP38 风满楼！全球资本市场巨幅动荡，腥风血雨时刻近在咫尺 as the central-bank actor whose expected rate cuts shape global risk appetite. The episode presents the Fed as trapped between supporting markets and avoiding the message that U.S. growth or employment has already weakened enough to require urgent easing.

EP39 风满楼下集：全球衰退慢慢逼近，严防死守步步为营！漫聊下半年美股、美债、汇率 adds two pressures to the Fed frame: recession signals such as Sahm Rule and manufacturing weakness, and fiscal/debt-service pressure from the U.S. Treasury. The episode treats cuts as likely over time but still ambiguous for risk assets.

EP57 美股动荡，东升西降？这回是走是留 adds a more immediate March 2025 market-volatility frame. Jerome Powell’s comments, nonfarm payroll data, and perceived Fed-political tension are treated as short-term triggers that make investors reluctant to add risk before policy and data signals stabilize.

Far Crimea: war comes to Russia’s door adds a historical leadership and reputation layer through Alan Greenspan. The episode credits Greenspan with defending Central Bank Independence, responding to Black Monday in 1987, and steering the 1990s boom, while also saying later crashes, the jobless recovery, housing excess, and the global financial crisis forced a reassessment of his judgment.

Vol.113 从几千页智库文件中，勾勒特朗普2.0执政计划背后的人、机构、思想和脉络 adds a conservative institutional-critique layer. The episode says Project 2025’s Fed chapter blames the Federal Reserve for inflation and recession cycles, proposes at minimum narrowing the Fed mandate toward price stability, and notes more radical free-banking ideas that would move money and interest rates closer to market discipline and Gold Monetary Anchor logic.

vol.128.关税战下一步走向何方？美国人民如何看待特朗普“百日新政”？| 狂喜播客节·对话仲树&Talich adds a May 2025 live-discussion version of the same independence problem. The source distinguishes current Jerome Powell resistance from the longer risk that the next chair and changed regulatory-review environment could make Central Bank Independence more fragile under Independent Agency Control Pressure.

Jerome Powell and the Test of Fed Independence adds a direct presidential-pressure layer. The Planet Money episode uses Jerome Powell, Lael Brainard, William McChesney Martin, Arthur Burns, and Donald Trump to frame the Fed as an institution whose credibility depends on resisting short-term political demands, defending its mandate publicly, and surviving legal tests around board-member removal.

Our mission: Find the world’s best economic ideas (Summer School World Tour) adds an origin-story link for the Fed’s explicit 2% inflation goal. The episode says the Federal Reserve announced that goal on January 25, 2012, after Inflation Targeting had spread from New Zealand / 新西兰’s earlier experiment with Arthur Grimes, Don Brash, and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

Indicators of 2025 and What to Watch in 2026 adds the federal funds rate as a 2026 indicator. The source, dated 2025-12-31, says the target range was 3.5% to 3.75% after three consecutive cuts, while unemployment, GDP growth, inflation above the 2% target, shutdown-disrupted data, dissent inside the Fed, Jerome Powell’s May 2026 chair transition, and Donald Trump pressure all made the rate path hard to read.

Do prediction market bettors make anything better? adds the Fed as an event-contract manipulation example rather than a monetary-policy actor. The source says prediction-market traders submitted questions in a Federal Reserve Zoom meeting to try to make an official say words they had bet on, linking the institution to Event Contract Manipulation Risk.

Vol.115 全球宏观和资本市场2025展望：短期问题不解决，就没有中期和长期了 adds the early-2025 market-expectations version. At the 2025-01-16 recording date, Ricky says the United States economy still looked strong and market expectations for 2025 cuts had fallen after 2024 delivered more cuts than he expected, keeping U.S. Mega-Cap Tech Right-Side Trade on the right side while raising volatility risk.

129.货币的本质，以及黄金的真正价值 | 串台十分吸引 adds the monetary-theory version of the Fed. The source treats central banks as discipline-seeking institutions inside a credit system, not omnipotent money printers: they provide clearing money and influence rates, but Endogenous Money Creation / 内生货币 means commercial-bank lending, payment, and repayment also create and destroy money. This strengthens the page’s link from rate policy to Money As Flow / 货币是流量 and Payment Clearing Network / 支付清算网络.

Source Position

  • Market expectations for Fed cuts are treated as unstable, moving from modest cuts toward larger or even emergency-cut speculation during stress.
  • The speakers argue that a cut can be interpreted as a negative signal if investors believe the Fed has seen a deeper problem.
  • The Fed’s timing is linked to Monetary Policy Lag because high rates can keep pressuring heavy-capex industries, housing, corporate finance, and equity valuations.
  • The discussion connects Fed timing to Yield Curve Inversion because inversion repair is presented as a historically risky phase.
  • EP39 adds that high policy rates can strain federal debt-service costs as old debt rolls into new rates.
  • The source connects Fed cuts to Treasury Duration Risk: lower rates may help bonds, but long-end supply and currency effects still matter.
  • EP57 adds that Fed communication can become a timing risk for Index Reentry Discipline when investors are waiting for evidence that volatility has cooled.
  • The Greenspan segment adds that Fed credibility depends on independence, data interpretation, and later judgment of whether policy missed a changing market regime.
  • The Qizhulou Yan Binke source adds that anti-Fed arguments can become part of Administrative State Dismantling, even though the episode doubts that abolishing the Fed is a likely near-term outcome.
  • The Qizhulou vol.128 source adds that the Fed-risk question may move from Powell’s present resistance to future chair succession and broader OMB / White House review pressure.
  • The Powell episode adds that the Fed’s independence problem can move from tweets and speeches into subpoenas, chair succession, Senate confirmation leverage, dissent, and litigation over For-Cause Removal Standard.
  • The New Zealand inflation-targeting episode adds that Fed credibility also depends on anchoring expectations around a public target, not only on resisting short-term political pressure.
  • The indicator source treats the federal funds rate as a compact public signal for growth, inflation, unemployment, dissent, chair succession, and presidential pressure.
  • The Kalshi source treats Fed communications as a settlement surface that traders may try to influence, not only forecast.
  • Vol.115 treats fewer expected 2025 cuts as compatible with continued U.S. equity momentum, while still making cash and short-duration assets useful portfolio optionality.
  • Episode 129 treats the Fed as one layer of monetary credibility within a wider dollar, bank-credit, payment-clearing, Treasury, and asset-pricing network.
  • Episode 155 adds that Fed-chair succession can become a direct market trigger when investors translate a nominee’s perceived hawkishness into rates, liquidity, and gold positioning.

Connections