华龙 / Hua Long (Western Han)
Updated · 1 episodes · 1 show · 1 source notes
Overview
华龙 / Hua Long enters the wiki through Hanji 469 as a minor but consequential Western Han court accuser in the first-stage 萧望之 case.
Current Profile
Hanji 469 presents Hua Long as a failed attachment figure. He had served as a daizhao under Emperor Xuan but lost office for bad conduct, then tried unsuccessfully to attach himself to 周堪 and related actors. After connecting with 郑朋, he becomes part of the accusation channel used by 弘恭 and 石显 against Xiao Wangzhi’s side.
Key Characteristics
- Former Han Xuan-era daizhao figure whose conduct had already damaged his standing.
- Failed court-attacher who could not enter Zhou Kan’s circle.
- Joins Zheng Peng in accusing Xiao Wangzhi’s side.
- Functions as a secondary opportunistic accuser rather than an independent policy actor.
Evidence
Failed attachment:
- Hanji 469 says Hua Long had been dismissed for misconduct and later failed to attach himself to Zhou Kan’s side.
Accusation role:
- Hanji 469 says Hong Gong and Shi Xian direct Hua Long and Zheng Peng to accuse Xiao Wangzhi’s circle while Xiao is on leave.
Qualifications
This page is source-scoped to Hanji 469. It does not reconstruct Hua Long’s full offices, exact misconduct, later fate, or the original wording of his accusation.
What Changed
- Created from Hanji 469 as a secondary accuser in Xiao Wangzhi’s first-stage fall.
Relationships
- 郑朋 - accusation partner in the Xiao Wangzhi case.
- 萧望之 and 周堪 - targets or failed patrons in the episode’s attachment-and-accusation sequence.
- 弘恭 and 石显 - inner-court actors who use Hua Long’s accusation.
- 投机型朝堂站队 - broader pattern Hua Long illustrates through failed attachment followed by hostile alignment.
Sources
1 source notes across 1 show
- 《资治通鉴·汉纪》469|为什么君子斗不过小人?看看萧望之的下场 芮淇讲透资治通鉴