贾山 / Jia Shan (Western Han)

Updated · 1 episodes · 1 show · 1 source notes

entity

Overview

贾山 / Jia Shan is a Western Han remonstrant who argues that private minting distributes part of the ruler’s power over wealth and rank to ordinary producers of money.

Current Profile

Hanji 216 preserves a compact political argument. Money may have little value as material, but it can purchase wealth and status; allowing ordinary people to make it therefore lets them share an authority that Jia Shan presents as properly imperial. He asks 汉文帝刘恒 to end private minting, but the emperor rejects the memorial.

The argument complements rather than duplicates 贾谊’s warning in the same episode. Jia Yi emphasizes incentives, coin quality, criminalization, labor allocation, and copper control, whereas Jia Shan makes authority over monetary creation part of sovereign control over social distribution.

Key Characteristics

  • Western Han court remonstrant represented through a monetary-sovereignty argument.
  • Treats money’s exchange power, not its material substance, as politically decisive.
  • Connects the ability to mint with control over wealth and rank.
  • Advocates ending private minting.
  • Adviser whose warning Liu Heng declines.

Evidence

Monetary and political authority:

  • Hanji 216 attributes to Jia Shan the premise that materially valueless money can obtain wealth and rank, making minting power politically consequential.

Policy position and reception:

  • Hanji 216 says he urges immediate repeal of permission for private minting and that Liu Heng refuses.

Qualifications

The current profile rests on one short popular-history note rather than Jia Shan’s complete biography, memorial text, or a study of early-Han monetary law. The wording, constitutional meaning of “shared authority,” exact policy proposal, and reason Liu Heng rejected it require comparison with transmitted sources. The argument should not be treated as a complete economic theory or as proof that all noncentral minting necessarily destroys sovereignty.

What Changed

  • Created a bounded profile distinguishing Jia Shan’s sovereignty argument from Jia Yi’s incentive-and-material-control analysis.

Relationships

  • 汉文帝刘恒 - emperor who rejects Jia Shan’s warning against private minting.
  • 贾谊 - fellow remonstrant whose economic and legal argument complements Jia Shan’s sovereignty claim.
  • 五铢钱中央统一铸造 - later policy mechanism that institutionalizes exclusive central mint authority.
  • 货币信用 - monetary trust problem adjacent to Jia Shan’s emphasis on who may create exchange value.

Sources

1 source notes across 1 show
  1. 《资治通鉴·汉纪》216|汉朝第一首富,竟然是文帝的男宠? 芮淇讲透资治通鉴