2026-08-29

The latest addition is 《资治通鉴·汉纪》830丨东汉李固：我虽死犹荣！, a 芮淇讲透资治通鉴 episode backfilling the 147-148 CE Liang Ji persecution layer before Hanji 832 and the 150-159 CE Liang-family arc. It adds 杜乔, 吴祐, 王调, 赵成, 郭亮, 董班, 杨匡, and 恐怖政治下的丧葬抗命, while extending 李固, 梁冀, 梁妠 / 梁太后, 车儿, 外戚专权与清算, 报复性政治恐怖, and 公开尸体羞辱. Its core synthesis is that Liang Ji’s terror can kill Li Gu and Du Qiao but cannot control their public meaning: petitions briefly force release, Wu You makes accusation responsibility visible, Li Gu’s final letter turns death into loyal testimony, and the displayed bodies draw defiant mourning and burial recovery rather than silence. No settled contradiction is recorded; Liu Wen, Liu Wei, Ma Rong’s drafting role, Luan Ba, the Xia Gate亭长, and exact final-letter wording remain source-scoped.

The latest addition is 《资治通鉴·汉纪》829丨君子为什么斗不过小人？, a 芮淇讲透资治通鉴 episode backfilling the 147 CE Huan-era accession field immediately before Hanji 830. It adds 刘文, 刘伟, 谢浩, and 清河王国, while extending 杜乔, 李固, 梁冀, 汉桓帝, 梁妠 / 梁太后, 梁盈, 刘蒜, 刘亏, 渤海王国, 唐衡, 左悺, 外戚专权与清算, 忠告不转化, and 善恶报应与政治结果错位. Its core synthesis is that Du Qiao’s failure is structural: accurate advice on appointment and reward reaches the throne but does not convert, Liang Ji can turn procedural refusal into resentment, and eunuch-side access recodes Li Gu and Du Qiao’s succession stance as personal offense to Huan. No settled contradiction is recorded; Hu Guang, Zhao Jie, Yuan Tang, Liu Guang, Zhao Jian, and the unnamed shangshu candidate remain source-scoped, with 赵建 kept distinct from existing 赵戬.